Cisco AP 1242 Radios have 5.4 GHz as an option in the current flash.

John


>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 04:08 PM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Following the FCC rules ?????
>
>Travis,
>Are saying you are using 5.4 GHz radios in the US?
>Scriv
>
>
>Travis Johnson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You make good points... however, the better question is how much money 
>> did Z-Tel take out of the business during this time? I would bet the 
>> owners and investors made BIG money during this time... so, so what if 
>> they are out of business now? If they made millions during that time, 
>> then it worked out for them.
>>
>> Same for DSL. I know there are companies that are going or gone now, 
>> but that made millions in profits during the past 5 years.
>>
>> Yes, DoD may have a little more push with the FCC, but, who's to say 
>> someone can't buy 5.4ghz right now today and put it up? Any user with 
>> internet access could order and install a 5.4ghz AP tomorrow.... for 
>> less than $300...
>>
>> Travis
>>
>>
>> Peter R. wrote:
>>
>>> Many of you probably don't follow the FCC much, so let me tell you 
>>> about the stroke of a pen:
>>>
>>> UNE-P which was the magic bullet for CLECs. No facilities needed. 
>>> Rock bottom pricing on voice lines. Market and sell. Z-Tel and a few 
>>> others had over 500k lines. Unfortunately, they didn't listen when 
>>> they were told it would be a stop gap to facilities. In other words, 
>>> sell UNE-P regionally and convert to facilities. No one listened. 
>>> Bang! UNE-P ruled no more. One year to move to facilities. Z-Tel just 
>>> filed BK, following many others that area shadow of their UNE-P selves.
>>>
>>> Another example: DSL. One day it is tariffed. Bang! No tariff. Go 
>>> nego with the ILEC.
>>>
>>> So please heed the warning about 5.4. It won't take much prodding 
>>> from DoD to wipe oout your business model.
>>>
>>> This is NOT a threat, folks.  This is how telecom regulations works 
>>> in the US.
>>>
>>> So skip the forms - 445 and 477. Keep using the unlincesed gear. Next 
>>> year you can all be pirates. That's okay, because you can celebrate 
>>> *Gasparilla* Pirate Fest in Tampa after that.
>>>
>>> Plus you say all this stuff on a PUBLIC, archived email list. DUH!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Peter @ RAD-INFO, Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Patrick Leary wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Sticker conscious?" So this is what we've become as an industry?
>>>> Following the very clear laws, which were once again just reiterated to
>>>> us after another in a long chain of WISP visits, or not has now been
>>>> reduced to simply being "sticker conscious" or "not sticker conscious"?
>>>> Why not go further and call yourself "Illegal and proud" or just "I
>>>> don't give a ____"? Let's not have any more "gee, I can't afford to be
>>>> legal!" That's not an argument that is credible today, with the range
>>>> from legal cheap to premium CPE running from about $170 to sub-$300 --
>>>> that's cheap.
>>>> My God, 5.4 is going to be a massive mess. OET will have to install a
>>>> special phone line just to handle the incoming DoD complaint calls.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick Leary
>>>> AVP WISP Markets
>>>> Alvarion, Inc.
>>>> o: 650.314.2628
>>>> c: 760.580.0080
>>>> Vonage: 650.641.1243
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>
>-- 
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to