The fact that there are now NOW isp's in that area means that this wasn't an
option.
We're on some l3 systems too. I've been told that they have a habit of just
dropping locations.
They are the ONLY facility in that area now that I shut down my lines and
moved to them. I'm debating a move back to phone lines but I don't know if
I want to spend the extra money.
laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage) Consulting services
42846865 (icq) WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] anyone see this?
It does make you wonder why the ISP in question wasn't multi-homed.
-Matt
Tim Wolfe wrote:
Thank The good Lord above that I never signed the TelCove contract for
bandwidth last year!. I mean, you really have no idea what the local
provider was doing wrong, but to turn off a school district and fire CO
on that system, COME ON!. You can bet the lawsuits from the school
district alone will make Level 3 think twice about doing this again?. If
you have an offending server, the stupid thing has an IP address, Block
it!. I would hope that Level 3 has enough smarts to do this?. Even a
little guy like me knows how to block an offending IP address, and I am
stupid, LOL!
Matt Liotta wrote:
http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/why-did-level-3-turn-off-a-rural-isp/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
