The problem with that is that it will usually be possible for data to move
sideways in a network before it gets up to an upstream provider.
marlon
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA
I doubt that is the case. If the upstream is inline and can provide the
data flow from a point of aggregation (upstream network connection) then
the TTP hardware connected upstream should be compliant.
Scriv
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
A ttp is compliant. But it's entirely possible (probably likely) that
the ttp's hardware will have to be at the wisp's local. Not at the
upstream.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage) Consulting services
42846865 (icq) WISP Operator since
1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA
Butch Evans wrote:
This is not acceptable. ALL facilities based service providers are
required to be compliant.
How is using a 3rd party not compliant? I seem to recall the FCC
specifically allows for 3rd parties to provide your compliance.
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
