I would disagree with that. Further, I would say that most of the folks using an MT/StarOS system would tell you that price had little or nothing to do with their decision. There are plenty of solutions available that are just as cheap as building your own, perhaps cheaper - all things considered.
On 4/1/07, Travis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And then the issue becomes how much that vendor is going to mark-up the product, in addition to the FCC cert costs for all their time, efforts, etc. Isn't the reason most people are using MT is because of the cost? How many people would buy a RB532 if it was $500? or $1,000? What is everyone's limit? ;) Travis Microserv Butch Evans wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Doug Ratcliffe wrote: > >> As far as Mikrotik goes, if any one/more/all MT vendor(s) in this >> country paid an FCC lab to certify the boards/radios (can't the >> radios/antennas can be modular certified by Ubiquiti/Senao?), could >> that work as a blanket certification that MT could attach to their >> boards/radios, or does each individual unit/vendor need an FCC >> certification? > > Each particular vendor will need a cert for the complete system they > build. FWIW, I have been pushing MANY vendors to build and certify > some Mikrotik radios. You can help yourself here by going to YOUR > vendor and asking them to do the same. > -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- Chad Halsted The Computer Works Conway, AR www.tcworks.net -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
