Thats the way I see it David.
I can do things most other wireless manufacturers 'won't" (networking
features at the AP or CPE).
The future of wireless is mesh or mesh type topographies. (OLSR/OSPF)
Even of I used a boxed bridged solution of very high quality such as
Alvarion, Trango, Moto, etc, I would still have to buy a router-wireless
soultion for the router and diversity customer delivery.
Why bother with the boxed bridge solution in the first place?
The hardware we choose is whats the best at the time for the software.
And it gets better and better all the time.
David Sovereen wrote:
I disagree completely.
The choice to use MT or StarOS has nothing to do with the hardware. My
decision to use MT was entirely based on the software features. Some of
my MTs run on Routerboards, others do not. If the Routerboard hardware
meets my needs at a price I like, I use it. If it doesn't, I use
something else. But I always use MT :-)
Dave
----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Our First WISP Consultant Vendor Member - Butch Evans
...
Mikrotik, StarOS, etc. are selling because of price. The extra
features are just a bonus. :)
...
--
George Rogato
Welcome to WISPA
www.wispa.org
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
