None of it does. BUT. What wireless access point owner is going to want to have to worry about who's using their wireless AP to send terroristic threats ? Especially if, when someone does, they're going to be liable if people trace it back that far.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Langseth Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:06 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] State Lawmakers Want To Limit Internet Porn Access I haven't read all of the calea law yet ... what part of it says anything about blocking access, I thought it was about traffic sniffing, not traffic censoring? Smells like FUD to me. On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 13:23 -0400, Smith, Rick wrote: > Ya know, they could use CALEA to lock down wireless units, and get a > side benefit > of blocking porn, without starting the whole "free speech" argument... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:18 PM > To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [WISPA] State Lawmakers Want To Limit Internet Porn Access > > > http://kutv.com/topstories/local_story_108212704.html > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
