Steve, well you did get me thinking about him (and my best remembered quote from him).
On 4/26/07, Peter R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's more likely that you would get 100 maximum to say I can't comply, since most won't want to make themselves known. And those 100 would be contacted. Cripes only a few hundred filled out the 477... you think a few thousand would light a bonfire? Mark Koskenmaki wrote: >I think Steve's point was to contrast Patrick Henry's determination with >some people's attitude that resistance is futile. > >Frankly, I think EVERY WISP should file that they are NOT compliant and have >no prospect of being. The FCC would simply be snowed under attempting to >deal with HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS of individual cases and would end up having >to make some kind of change in the way they do business. > >I don't know how many people work there, but for them to adequately deal >with 500, 1000, or even 10,000 "cannot comply" filings, well, I KNOW they >can't. This would force changes in the way they expect to deal with such >a diverse and LARGE group. They're used to regulating industries with a >handful of players. For them to take on regulating an industry with more >operators than telephone companies, radio stations, and cell phone operators >combined is a challenge far beyond what I think they had any inkling they >would be required to do. > > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
