I don't know why you don't believe the 2000 subscriber figure. The goal of the article is clearly not to pump the system up.
The City, for what it's worth, did not risk all that much. "Some employees' time", I think is what the article said - though that could be considerable! Cell Net took most of the burden. On 4/28/07, ralph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why in heaven's name would Madison risk that much of a project on unproven equipment? What kind of track record does Cisco have in mesh? They must not have done a "proof of concept" area first. The 2000 sub initial sub number isn't believable anyway, though. Mesh take rates are nowhere near that high. Someone isn't putting out correct figures.
-- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
