On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:17:17 -0700 George Rogato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mark Koskenmaki wrote: > > >> Why does wispa want to take an antagonistic stance towards legal high > >> tech wiretapping? > > > > BECAUSE IT IS FREAKING WRONG, GEORGE, for the government to shift the cost > > of law enforcement to specific business entities for its own convenience. > > Why can't you see this? > > > > When I was in the electrical contracting business, I was forced to have > all kinds of fees laid upon me to conduct business. > > This isp business is one of the least regulated with the least intrusive > and least government costs. > > If your moaning and groaning about what will probably turn out to be > very low cost solutions, (an assumption) what are you going to do when > it comes time to hire employees and then fall inline with those > government regulations and costs? > > In my case with less than 30 subs, one network operator (me), and tiny budget, there is no way i can afford even a low cost solution. let alone 4 or 5 employees. So unless some miracle occurs, I will close shop on May 12. Mission accomplished .... one less little guy in the mix. Ed -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
