Matt Liotta wrote:
John Scrivner wrote:
We look forward to proving that this thinking is wrong. What part of
CALEA compliance is it that makes you think we cannot develop a low
cost and reasonable solution which will not break the bank?
Even if you do come up with a way to handle LI in time for the
deadline that is only going to solve one part of CALEA. We checked
with Cisco in the beginning regarding CALEA. We were assured they were
working on it and would have a solution in time (much the same way
WISPA has). We now have Cisco's solution and understand it does
exactly what they say it would do; namely LI. Unfortunately, LI isn't
enough as I have outlined in other posts. We have had to develop the
rest of the solution on our own.
Reread my post on the practical requirements of dealing with ELSUR and
check with your attorneys. I think you'll find no technical solution
to those requirements.
-Matt
I think people are missing the 3 parts:
1) The Plan - the form to be filed by May 14
2) The ability to Intercept (hardware capability)
3) The data formatting & VPN or FTP to the LEA
Cisco and some other equipment is "CALEA Compliant" in that you can
collect a tcpdump or whatever.
But then you need to collect that data, extract only the data that the
LEA needs, and send it to them within 8 seconds in real-time,
transparently, without adding noticeable latency.
The plan needs to be filed to let the FCC and the Feds know that you
have thought upon compliance and have an idea of what you will do
if/when presented with a subpoena.
The TTP mainly does # 3.
You still need # 1 and # 2
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
