Butch Evans wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alan Cain wrote:
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not a viable
solution. I don't see a large number of people stepping up to the
plate and defending your position.
Whoa, there now! Civil disobedience is always a viable solution.
Civil disobedience is (in the context that Dawn was using it) the
breaking of existing law. In spite of your 60's heritage, breaking the
law is NOT an acceptable action. I understand your position (in
theory, not practice), but CHANGING law through political influence is
one thing. Ignoring it is not a smart thing.
Um, that is what the DISOBEDIENCE in civil disobedience means.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
