I hear ya.  It sounds great.  Don't feed the trolls =D

Craig M. Grenier 
Production TAC Engineer 
Savvis, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Built to RespondTM 

This message contains information which may be confidential and/or
privileged.  Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive for the intended recipient), you may not read, use, copy or
disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the
message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the
sender by reply e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the
message and any attachment(s) thereto without retaining any copies.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Next Big Thing in Wireless

What do you mean? I have been talking to him for two months about this. 
Where did you get that this is an ad? I asked him to post this message 
to get a feel for how WISPs would respond. He even sent it to me for 
review prior to sending it out here. I guess I am having trouble 
understanding why this would be considered an ad. They are looking for 
support for a declaratory ruling from the FCC on this matter. Mike would

like to see WISPA help him on this and I think we should at least 
consider this.
Scriv


Dawn DiPietro wrote:

> Sounds like an ad too. :-)
>
>
> Jory Privett wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a great idea.  I only have one issue from what I read 
>> here, $500 per link seems high.  Most ISPs complain about the $250 
>> they pay now for CPEs.
>>
>> Jory Privett
>> WCCS
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "michael mulcay" 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 4:23 PM
>> Subject: [WISPA] The Next Big Thing in Wireless
>>
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> As we wireless operators know, the costs of licensed networks
>>> (equipment, antennas and licensing) makes providing services to the
>>> majority of subscribers prohibitively expensive, and the cost at 
>>> auction
>>> for spectrum (for WiMax and 4G products) is beyond the reach of most
of
>>> us.
>>>
>>> To overcome these problems, two years ago Wireless Strategies began
>>> research into ways to use new technologies -- WiMAX and smart
antennas
>>> -- to reuse side lobe radiation around sites of point-to-point 4GHz
and
>>> 6GHz microwave links under the present FCC rules and without causing
>>> additional interference.
>>>
>>> Our finding is that networks can be designed to operate with smart
>>> antennas with distributed radiators and that the new paths can be
>>> concurrently coordinated, under existing FCC rules and without
causing
>>> additional interference.
>>>
>>> We believe that concurrent coordination will be "The Next Big Thing
in
>>> Wireless," leveling the playing field by making it possible for 
>>> WISPs to
>>> obtain multipurpose licensed spectrum at pennies on the dollar
compared
>>> to obtaining it at auction. By making use of the formerly wasted
side
>>> lobe radiation of 4GHz and 6GHz paths, WISPs will be able to use
IEEE
>>> 802.16-based (WiMAX) equipment with small antennas to provide
licensed
>>> broadband services to hundreds of additional subscribers at a
>>> provisioning cost of only about $500 per link. We appreciate that
some
>>> members of the industry may initially perceive any change to the
status
>>> quo as a threat, but we believe that concurrent coordination will
>>> provide extraordinary benefits to the entire industry, especially 
>>> WISPs.
>>>
>>> Due to the potential for unprecedented industry-wide changes from
the
>>> use of antennas with distributed radiators to provide multiple-path
>>> low-cost broadband services under the existing FCC rules, Wireless
>>> Strategies decided to remove any uncertainty for investors and
service
>>> providers by, on February 23, 2007, filing with the Federal
>>> Communications Commission, a Request for a Declaratory Ruling on
>>> Compliance of Fixed Microwave Antennas Having Distributed Radiating
>>> Elements.
>>>
>>> However, to date, the FCC has taken no action. We believe that 
>>> emails of
>>> support from the WISP community can help speed up the process, by
>>> encouraging the FCC to either issue the requested declaratory ruling
or
>>> to issue a Public Notice for industry comment.
>>>
>>> Therefore, if you would like a copy of our FCC filing and/or 
>>> information
>>> about the new concept of concurrent coordination, please contact me
at
>>> Wireless Strategies 831-659-5618 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>>> additional information you can also visit our web site at
>>> www.wirelessstrategies.net.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Michael Mulcay, CEO
>>> Wireless Strategies, Inc.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to