I just don't know enough about the innerworkings of N-Streme to know if it
is WIFI enough to use the whole thing.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
If a radio had a design like "listen before transmit for clear airspace
and only transmit when the clock says I can" then it could be used in any
band including all of 3650. What would keep this out of all of 3650?
Scriv
Mike Hammett wrote:
The N-Streme protocol has been around for a while and supports polling
and resolves many disadvantages in WIFI. N-Streme may not be able to
work in 3.6 GHz as it may not be wifi enough. They could couple the GPS
sync with the N-Streme at least for other bands.
MT systems have the among (if not the best) performance out there for
among the lowest pricing. Within a few months the whole MT certified
system will be a non-issue.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael J. Erskine"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Mike Hammett wrote:
I know Mikrotik has been getting beat up over not having it.
I guess I wasn't paying attention.
Pretty much any reason they stated why they couldn't do it was
refuted by seemingly knowledgeable people. As typical, when Mikrotik
was proved incorrect, they acted like a bunch of 5 year olds.
I have yet to see them do any such thing. It might be useful here to
explain that Mikrotik is a vendor of router platforms. It is nice that
they have these cool little boards which can accept, *among other
things* cool little radios. That does not make them a wireless vendor.
For example, we are only marginally interested in using MT at the edge
or our network but we are very interested in replacing our existing NOC
with a something almost completly MT based.
So you see, it may well be that there is no real reason for MT to try to
compete in the TDM arena. They don't build radios. They don't have
their systems FCC certified but anyone who so chooses could probably
make money doing that and then reselling their product.
All of that said, do you know of a TDM radio card that comes in a format
which can be installed in a MT router? For that matter do you know of a
TDM radio which comes as any kind of card even PCI? There really is no
point to GPS sync on a CSMA/CA based system such as 802.11x.
So the question I have is what sort of system components would one
combine with an MT to start doing GPS based TDM communications and the
second part is when would I use GPS sync in I was not running a TDM
system?
Thanks
-m-
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
I personally wish all manufacturers would standardize on a GPS sync
system to allow for multiple reuse of frequencies. This is one place
where Motorola definitely has the right idea. I have never seen a
convincing argument for any reason why GPS sync is not a great thing
for reuse of spectrum and I feel it should be encouraged by us to
standards bodies who are designing the future generations of
unlicensed radio platforms. Is there a downside to GPS sync?
Scriv
Mike Hammett wrote:
How difficult is it to engineer sectors with greater isolation? With
only 50 MHz, we're going to have to become champions of spectrum
reuse.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Principal WISPA Member List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Getting closer to a 3650 reality!
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 (408) 907-6910
(Vonage) Consulting services
42846865 (icq) WISP Operator
since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Lubar"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FCC Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 9:54 AM
Subject: [WISPA FCC] FCC 3650 band response today..
Greetings everyone..
I wanted to make everyone aware of today's published response from
the
FCC regarding the reconsideration of its 3650 NPRM..
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-99A1.pdf
Note that the petitions for reconsideration of this rule making
have
been denied and 3650 band usage in the United States is now one
step
closer.
Respectfully,
Dan Lubar
RelayServices
_______________________________________________
FCC mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/fcc
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
