Butch: There were actually two different whitespace devices tested by the FCC, and they were very much prototypes.
Making a device for whitespaces is markedly different than anything vendors such as Alvarion have ever done, because a whitespaces device has to guard against interfering with television broadcast signals AND wireless microphones (yes, really - wireless microphones are a licensed use of whitespace spectrum). Until there are real whitespace rules at least proposed... how does a company like Alvarion even know what to attempt to build? Thanks, Steve On 8/9/07, Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I presume you're referring to mobile applications. I know that you > (Alvarion) have a mobile 900 product, so the step to this lower band > should be and easy one for that technology anyway. > > You don't have any information on what device the FCC tested and > failed, do you? You're the guy that would know if anyone does. :-) > > -- > Butch Evans > Network Engineering and Security Consulting > 573-276-2879 > http://www.butchevans.com/ > My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6 > Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf > Mikrotik Certified Consultant > http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html -- Steve Stroh 425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
