On 10/15/07, Charles Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Additional things that would be helpful (just my personal opinion) > > 1. Relax the interference resistance requirement for Part 101 (systems > today don't need the 90 dB SNR that analogue systems from the 80s > required...) > > 2. Decrease the license grant to 5 years (it's a PITA trying to contact > companies that are out of business to see if it's ok to deply
It would also have the happy side-effect of doubling your license coordination business! But seriously, I see how attempting to contact out-of-business companies is a waste of time - but is it any different from attempting to contact in-business companies? Take the address out of the database and send mail. They reply within thirty days or don't. It's not your responsibility to track them down if they haven't updated the EN table. The one real problem I see with OOB companies is that they can't respond to requests for expedited coordination. Maybe there's a way to look up and weed out closed businesses. 3. 3.9 GHz What's this? Best, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON ** ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA www.ispcon.com ** ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT ** ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 ** ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at http://www.ispcon.com/register.php ** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
