George,
Comcast's customers are the ones paying for access to the Comcast
network. If a Comcast customer wants to use Vuze, he should be able to
because he is ALREADY PAYING FOR THE RIGHT TO USE THE NETWORK.
This idea of content providers being "parasites" on networks is a total
load of horsecrap promoted by the phone and cable companies to keep
their networks as closed as possible.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
George Rogato wrote:
Another thought is
Why wouldn't Vuze have to pay Comcast for using the Comcast network to
support it's business plan.
If they are relying on Comcasts network to store and send files to
it's customer base, why should they be treated for a free ride instead
of using a hosting provider like Akamia.
Guess that is just as a significant point as any other, the fair
compensation for services?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
