Matt,
Everyone is asking about peering with Google... and I would like to ask
you because you already are peered with them... do you actually see that
much traffic going to and from Google? I would think peering with
Microsoft or NBC or places like that would be much more beneficial?
thanks,
Travis
Microserv
Matt Liotta wrote:
George Rogato wrote:
Thats my thoughts. But, if NBC isn't paying Akamai, it won't be on
their servers.
Once you are on a peering exchange it is as easy as asking with Akamai
since they have an open peering policy. Although, some networks with
open peering policies will not peer with you if they are already
peered with one or more of your upstreams. That is our policy for
example.
I'm in the Pittock Building, wonder how easy it is to connect to
akamai or google.
Google is going to require peering in more than one location.
-Matt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
