Not that it isn't a good idea, but I don't think there is a legal 
requirement to back data on DHCP leases.  You do need to have a way to 
monitor traffic from the time they call though.

        Sam Tetherow
        Sandhills Wireless



D. Ryan Spott wrote:
> Don't forget to track who has what dynamic IP address, and when they  
> had it.
>
> You will need this information with the law enforcement agencies come  
> a knocking for some kiddie porn peddler using your network.
>
> ryan
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Jason Hensley wrote:
>
>   
>> Not sure where the 10+ minutes per install addition for a static IP  
>> comes
>> into play.  Takes 30 seconds or so to program that in.  Yeah, not  
>> quite as
>> convenient as DHCP, and you run the risk of duplicate IP's if you get
>> sloppy, but otherwise I see a huge advantage with static.
>>
>> Renumbering, like you mentioned, is also MUCH easier if you have  
>> internal
>> privates.  I NAT at the headend - not at each tower / POP.  Makes  
>> management
>> very easy for me.
>>
>> For me, static works, dhcp doesn't.  Of course, everyone is different.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
>> On
>> Behalf Of Ryan Langseth
>> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 5:12 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Private vs Public addresses for end-users
>>
>> There are things like looking at the customer base.
>>
>> 1) are they likely to need incoming connections  ( This is mainly for
>> businesses )
>> 2) are they likely to get a worm and have it start spamming ( I hate  
>> trying
>> to track down a spammy machine behind NAT ... its not hard just
>> annoying)
>> 3) are they going to have problems with double NAT, the customers  
>> router
>> will be doing nat also.  Certain system do not handle that very nicely
>>
>> Frankly I hate using Private IPs for customers at all,  I also  
>> strongly
>> dislike not doing DHCP unless the customer is paying for that static.
>> Static IP addressing is a PITA if you have to renumber,  obivously  
>> with
>> privates that problem is largely gone.
>>
>> Depending on where you are doing your NAT,  I would suggest if you  
>> go that
>> route to do it at your Head End, not at your edge routers.  That way  
>> you can
>> implement one of the common IDS/IPS systems to find problem customers
>> (virus, etc) .
>>
>> Not doing DHCP, if you plan on being profitable, imo, is also a major
>> mistake.  You will end up consuming 10+ minutes of your install  
>> techs and
>> CSRs time per install.
>>
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2008, at 3:37 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Tom DeReggi wrote:
>>>       
>>>> whether to give private or public address has nothing to do with
>>>> cost.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Oh, what are the thing to consider exactly?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ugo Bellavance
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>       
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>     
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>   


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to