Don't hold me to this, but I have been told from a very "super" reliable huge StarOS user that StarOS does not bridge well at all. If you are counting on bridging from your client/cpe to the AP -- - - StarOS is not an option.
Mac > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Travis Johnson > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List > Subject: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS > > Hi, > > Anyone care to help "compare" a Mikrotik based bridged AP/CPE solution > to StarOS? > > Here is a quick list I have come up with. I would love to have everyone > add their thoughts... > > Mikrotik features: > graphical user interface (Winbox) > more features (Torch, etc) > more hardware choices (RB532, RB411, RB600, etc.) > Nstreme protocol > very reliable > > StarOS features: > FCC certified CPE > lower price > 'Sync' feature (reconfigure all CPE from the AP side with a single > change, such as frequency) > OLSR feature > VoIP priority with minimal config > 200 CPE per wireless card (capable) > > Travis > Microserv > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
