What this author so quickly forgets is, Spectrum is to serve the public interest not the treasury's pocket. And the Public pays more, when the providers pay more for spectrum. The auctiioon clearly will be a victory, if it means more than one or tow big companies get a peice.
Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Broadwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 1:48 PM Subject: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ > > REVIEW & OUTLOOK > > Purblind Auction > February 7, 2008; Page A18 > > The Federal Communications Commission is bragging about its latest > wireless > auction, with total bids of more than $19 billion after two weeks. But dig > beneath those numbers and the picture is less rosy. > > This wireless "spectrum" is on the market because of the transition to > digital television broadcast. As of February 17, 2009, TVs without digital > tuners or cable or satellite hook-ups will go dark, and a big swath of the > airwaves will be free for other uses. This spectrum can transmit data over > long distances and penetrates walls much better than most current wireless > phone spectrum. > [Kevin Martin] > > But FCC Chairman Kevin Martin wasn't content to sell this real estate to > the > highest bidder. Instead, he embarked on a central-planning experiment, > setting aside the two biggest blocks for special uses. The FCC's > procedures > require blind, confidential bidding, so there is much about the auction > that > we won't know until it wraps up. But it already seems clear that Mr. > Martin's rules have damaged the value of otherwise choice spectrum and are > harming the overall auction. > > For example, the FCC restricted the single biggest spectrum license for a > public-private "public safety" partnership. The idea was that someone > would > buy it to create a nationwide network for "first responders" -- fire and > police departments and the like -- with secondary use as a commercial > wireless network. But the main lobbyist for that spectrum, former FCC > Chairman Reed Hundt's Frontline Wireless, closed up shop before the > auction > began. So far, this so-called "D block" of spectrum has attracted exactly > one bid in 40 rounds, and that bid is less than $500 million -- well below > the FCC's $1.3 billion reserve price. > > The FCC designated the next-biggest block -- the "C block" -- for "open > access" at the urging of Google, among others. The C block is not only > large, but it divides the country into eight large regional groups, with > the > possibility of bidding on all eight as a package. It should be a top > prize. > But it only passed its $4.6 billion reserve price late last week, and the > reason is almost certainly the FCC's "open access" rule. That rule > requires > whoever wins to open the network to all compatible phones or software. If > you're spending billions on spectrum and billions more building the > network, > the fact that the feds might force you to share your network means greater > investment risk. > > The bidding bears this out. Of the $19 billion bid so far, nearly > three-quarters has gone toward the smaller bits of spectrum in the A, B > and > E blocks. Building a national network by cobbling together hundreds of > these > bits is inefficient and risky, and it doesn't serve consumers, who would > get > faster service and more flexibility from the larger blocks. > > But there's more. The FCC made these small blocks to encourage start-ups > and > new entrants to bid for a piece of the next-generation wireless pie. If > the > conditions placed on the C and D blocks are driving the big established > players into the smaller auctions, then the new, little guys may well be > playing in the same sandbox with the big, bad incumbents. > > The FCC's previous experiments with rigging auctions also flopped; witness > the NextWave bankruptcy, which tied up billions of dollars of spectrum for > years. Mr. Martin will claim victory in the auction no matter what > happens. > But what we'll never know is how much would have been bid -- and thus how > much more the Treasury would have received -- if Mr. Martin had auctioned > this spectrum without his favors for special interests attached. > > Jeff Broadwick > Sales Manager, ImageStream > 800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can) > +1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l) > +1 574-935-8488 (Fax) > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
