On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Brad Belton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yah, Rogelio left that pretty open ended. For anyone to be able to give > you > suggestions more information will be needed. Sorry, in these cases, I don't really know enough to always ask the best question first time around. :) > > > Path distance? > Line of Sight? > Antenna size/mount limitations? > RF limitations? > Required payload capacity? > Required uptime? (e.g. 99.9%, 99.99%, 99.999%) > Interface required? (e.g. 10/100 copper, SM fiber, MM fiber, T1, DS3, > GigE > etc, etc.) > Cable run length between outside mount and inside handoff? In this case, it's about 5 city blocks away and is (I'm told) a direct line of site. Someone else is going to go out there to confirm, but for now, that's what I'm told. There are about 10 cameras (2 at each location x 5 locations). Each of those will send back approximately 3 Mbps of traffic back to the main aggregate point on (I just found out) 4.9Ghz. I'm still learning the channels and the bandwidth management there, and I'm wondering if I might use polarization (put half on vertical, other half on horizontal) to decrease the interference and have the cameras use more of the channels. Thanks, guys! Also on LinkedIn? Shoot me an invite: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
