I have only t ried one or two of the 2.4 only cards, but they worked just 
fine.

I have, however, used a ton of the AG p23 cards and aside from the rare one 
going deaf,  I've not seen that.

Biggest reason for them to fail to associate in star-os for me, is that I 
failed to set the distance... :(

Would these by any chance NOT be "super" cards?    There's some around that 
are not.   They may not work if you specify "super ag" in the config.




++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
<insert witty tagline here>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 10:00 AM
Subject: [WISPA] WLM54G - Unexpected Results


> Has anyone else had a problem with the WLM54-G?  I've had alot of them 
> lately just give me wierd unexpected results.
>
> I'm using StarOS...
>
> With a WLM54-G (100mW card), I get no association (we're using 802.11b 
> mode)
>
> Pop in a WLM54-GP23 (200mW card), I get -70 receive at the tower.  Same 
> with WLM54-SAGP23
>
> This is not right... Any others experiencing the same scenario???
>
>
>
> Mark Nash
> UnwiredWest
> 78 Centennial Loop
> Suite E
> Eugene, OR 97401
> 541-998-5555
> 541-998-5599 fax
> http://www.unwiredwest.com
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to