Mike

Right now it is in draft but very close to going to the next stage. But
there is a lot more going on here than just a standard. 
        - The 802.22 is setting a precedence, besides the engineers that are
creating 802.22 also involved are the incumbents that hold the TV channels
and they have been very valuable in making the standard will not interface
with digital TV and vice versa. And the FCC has to be an integrated part to
make 802.22 THE standard for data whitespace as they have with ATSC, the
only way this is going to happen is if every WISP gets involved now.
        - We need to get the FCC to do a light licensed in the same way
3.65Ghz has been done, at least for part of the band. The channels we are
talking about are VHF and UHF from 2-51 (not including 37) which are as
follows for the US:

VHF                             UHF                                     UHF
UHF
Channel Frequency       Channel Frequency               Channel Frequency
Channel Frequency
2               54Mhz           14              471.25Mhz               27
549.25Mhz               40              627.25Mhz
3               60Mhz           15              477.25Mhz               28
555.25Mhz               41              633.25Mhz
4               66Mhz           16              483.25Mhz               29
561.25Mhz               42              639.25Mhz
5               76Mhz           17              489.25Mhz               30
567.25Mhz               43              645.25Mhz
6               82Mhz           18              495.25Mhz               31
573.25Mhz               44              651.25Mhz
7               174Mhz          19              501.25Mhz               32
579.25Mhz               45              657.25Mhz
8               180Mhz          20              507.25Mhz               33
585.25Mhz               46              663.25Mhz
9               186Mhz          21              513.25Mhz               34
591.25Mhz               47              669.25Mhz
10              192Mhz          22              519.25Mhz               35
597.25Mhz               48              675.25Mhz
11              198Mhz          23              525.25Mhz               36
603.25Mhz               49              681.25Mhz
12              204Mhz          24              531.25Mhz               37*
609.25Mhz               50              687.25Mhz
13              210Mhz          25              537.25Mhz               38
615.25Mhz               51              693.25Mhz
                                26              543.25Mhz               39
621.25Mhz               52              699.25Mhz
* Cannot be used

As you can see there is a large jump from VHF to UHF. We have already
confirmed we can make two radios, one for the lower VHF bands covering the
156Mhz that could be used as well as one to cover UFH which is 228Mhz wide.
>From a manufacturing perspective it is not cost effective to make a radio
that covers 645Mhz, even 228Mhz is pushing it. 

- From the table above it seems very simple, to me at lease, use VHF for the
Wireless Innovation Alliance
(http://www.wirelessinnovationalliance.com/index.cfm) and UFH for WISP using
part 90 light licensed using 802.22 in this part of the band.
        - The reason for this is two-fold, first the incumbents are already
working with 802.22 and without them on our side it is going to be very hard
to get this done. Don't forget DTV is first tier in the band everything else
is 2nd tier we must not interface and the 802.22 protocol make sure of this.
Second, is the flip side, the WIA does not have the incumbents support (from
what I read anyone this is my option only!) and it trying to make the white
space another Wifi which as all WISP know will not work well for outdoor
networks!

- I highly recommend that everyone takes the time to read the FULL 802.22
spec as it really is all WISP have ever wanted in a protocol! I am CC Carl
Stevenson on this email as he is the chair of IEEE 802.22 and he can double
check the above to make sure there are no issues.

- Comments?
        
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com 



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 5:32 PM
To: WISPA List
Subject: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces

What is the status of this?  I am investigating it more since Tony made
reference to 802.22.  I became interested when I saw a provision for channel
bonding.

Have there been any references to a 3.65 esque license so the bands won't be
filled with junk?


----------
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to