I wonder if the chip could be changed to give you more memory. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Travis Johnson wrote: > >>And although I have great respect for StarOS, the Mikrotik >>community is at least 10x bigger than StarOS... it would make more >>sense for Ubiquiti to load Mikrotik on the Nano's... ;) > > First, there is not enough flash on the Nanos to hold MT. IIRC, the > flash on the nano is 4M (maybe 8?). I can't recall exactly, but > it's not enough either way. That is the only thing that limits the > ability to run MT on the Nano, as the remaining hardware is pretty > close to the same thing as the RB133C. > > -- > ******************************************************************** > *Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation * > *Network Engineering *MikroTik RouterOS * > *573-276-2879 *ImageStream * > *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE * > *http://blog.butchevans.com/ *Wired or wireless Networks * > *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Professional Technical Trainer * > ******************************************************************** > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
