They already added the bigger amp. They worked with me by trying to move to 919 however it's too noisy for their purposes so they will be moving back to 910. This will affect 906 and 915. 924 is virtually unusable so things will be interesting.
I was just wondering if there was any legal precedence. Since there is not, and I am not interested in trying to set one, I'll work around it. Fortunately we are not completely dependent on 900. We'll upgrade the antennas, re-assign freq's as best we can, raise the minimum signal level, and move weaker users to another band so I'm not completely hosed. It's just a PITA and costly. __________________________________ Jerry Richardson airCloud Communications -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Kerns Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 8:31 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction Jerry, >From where you are located, I believe you are being hit by a new repeater on Mt Diablo. It seems the HAMs were using another freq and it was interfering with military operations. They kept reducing power til it was down to nothing. They then decided to use 900 mhz, it is only going to get worse as they intend to add more AMP to it. It will most likely take out all 900 in the Central Valley, your area and the Bay Area. I wonder what all the power co's meters that are on 900 also will do..... this is not going to be a pleasant thing for HAM's... right or wrong. ----- Original Message ---- From: "Jerry Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 8:16 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction >I determined the best course of action is to upgrade the antennas and > re-assign frequencies customer AP re-assignments. > > 900 is getting crowded and eventually I will likely have to abandon the > frequency. I'm not going to make a big stink about this one only to have > to deal with it again in six months or a year. > > Life's too short. > > __________________________________ > Jerry Richardson > airCloud Communications > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Larry Yunker > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 8:04 AM > To: 'WISPA General List' > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction > > Jerry, > > As with all good legal questions, the answer is: "It Depends". > > If the HAM operator is INTENTIONALLY interfering with your signal, then > you > have a very good chance of maintaining a cause of action against him > (IMHO). > If on the other hand, he was unaware of your signal at the time that he > put > up his equipment, you have very little chance of maintaining an action. > The > iffy party is when he falls in between knowing and intentional. If he > knew > you were out there, but he didn't mean to shut you down, there is an > argument both ways as to whether he is liable. > > I guess the first thing is to determine whether he knew you were > operating > on the same frequency as the one on which he was planning to deploy. > > Regards, > Larry Yunker > Network Consultant > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > DISCLAIMER: The above comments are solely an opinion and should not be > construed to be legal advice. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jerry Richardson > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 3:45 PM > To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Motorola Canopy User Group > Subject: [WISPA] Court Injunction > > Is it possible to get an injunction against a HAM if he moved to a > 900MHz frequency as is causing interference that would disrupt our > ability to do business? I know he has a license and I don't however > there must be some precedent that allows for commercial venture versus > amateur radio. > > Any ideas? > > > Jerry Richardson > VP Operations > 925-260-4119 > P Please consider the environment before printing this email > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/