Good luck. We fought this fight last year. First they said the problem didn't exist. So, we sent supouts and posted tests to the forum until we were blue in the face. Then they said we didn't have the settings correct but refused to give us the settings that works. So, we tested with every known variation in setting we could think of. Then it was that we didn't have enough bandwidth going across the link to keep latency low. At that point, we gave up. Turning off NStreme worked better for us and now we are switching to other solutions.
> Hi, > > For anyone that would like to see the Mikrotik Nstreme protocol > re-designed to support more than 30 clients (their "new" > recommendation), and have lower, consistent latency, please email them > directly and let them know ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). They claim they are > "listening to customer requests" and will work on a solution if they get > enough requests to fix it. > > Please also CC: me on the email so I can have an idea of how many people > are interested. > > thanks, > > Travis > Microserv > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
