(Possibly correcting things I said earlier.)  The only official mention of 
power limits is 40 mW for adjacent channel use and higher power in 
non-adjacent channels.  This on Page 2 of Commissioner Tate's statements.


----------
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:37 PM
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Cc: "WISPA Board Members List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [WISPA] My mistake- WE WON!!!!!

> Guys,
>
> I just got word that 100mw was only for personal portable.
>
> FCC proposed rules also includes a provision for 5 Watts Fixed
> deployment!!!!!!
>
> WooHoo!!!!!!!!
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
>
>
>> Yes, I agree 4 Watts would have been a huge victory, but we didn't get 4
>> watts.  It appears that we got 100mw EIRP, which is worthless for 
>> anything
>> other than short range personal portable devices.
>> It appears that we got shut out. At 100mw, they might have well just
>> auctioned it to the RBOCs, at least consumers would have had a chance to
>> get
>> "broadband" that way.
>>
>> We'll have to see what the rules actually say tommorrow. Maybe the
>> Arcticle
>> writer misunderstood, and it was 100mw radio power and 4 watts could be
>> achieved with antenna gain.
>> But unforutneately, I don't think so.  We'll see.
>>
>> If it is really only 100mw EIRP, we'll need to get back up on the lobby
>> floor, and fight for more TX power.
>>
>> My personal opinion is that it should still be possible to convince the
>> FCC
>> to allow 4 watts.
>> I think the unlicensed community originally wanted more power also. And
>> Geolocation w/ database meets the broadcaster's requirements.
>> Broadcasters already endorsed 20w on non-adjacenet channels.
>> There was no sound reason to deny 4 watts on non-adjacent channels, 
>> unless
>> there is a conspiracy against WISPs.
>>
>> Its also possible that the FCC got confused by WISPA's message,
>> misinterpretting that we wanted low power in unlicensed.
>> The FCC left the door open for further comment on whether higher power
>> licensed should be allowed in "rural areas".
>>
>> At this point, I think it will end up being to WISP's best interest to
>> jump
>> back on the Unlicensed bandwagon, where there is FCC support, and lobby
>> for
>> 4watts.
>>
>> But I'm gonna stop talking, as I'm getting all worked up, before I have
>> all
>> the facts posted to the public tommorrow.
>>
>> Tom DeReggi
>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
>>
>>
>>>I can make do with 4 watts EIRP if that is what we end up with.
>>> If the is the only thing we didn't get, I would say we pitched a 
>>> shutout.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:13 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
>>>
>>>
>>>> Useful power levels in the whitespaces.
>>>>
>>>> B UT, we've not seen the actual rules from the FCC yet.  It's entirely
>>>> possible that the rules will be better than what's being reported so
>>>> far.
>>>> marlon
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:56 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What exactly didn't we win?
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:08 PM
>>>>> Subject: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/110408-fcc-whilte-spaces.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>>
>>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to