No but they will be about 20 feet high for an H pol 600 MHz slotted 
waveguide 16 dBi 120 degree sector.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage


>I could see 16 dB sectors.  Of course they will be large, but that's what 
>it
> takes at these frequencies.  We'll have antennas the same size as the
> broadcast TV antennas are now (I've seen some over 40' tall).  Hopefully a
> manufacturer can work something out with regards to not having to have 4x
> 40' sectors on a tower to provide the needed coverage...  that could 
> result
> in some tasty rates.
>
> I don't think the number of wifi devices we see is a useful argument. 
> Their
> response is 3.65 and 5.4 GHz...  plenty of new space and no wifi devices.
> We need to stress the penetration abilities and the need for copious 
> amounts
> of spectrum that has these penetration abilities.  I believe these lower
> frequencies will help fill in coverage gaps within any given range.  We 
> may
> not have any more range with TVWS vs. existing bands with equal EIRP 
> because
> of smaller antenna requirements, but buildings and trees no longer make 
> that
> coverage spotty.
>
>
> ----------
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:50 AM
> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
>
>> Hmmm
>>
>> Just for fun I ran the numbers at 600mhz.
>>
>> 20 dB tx from the radio, 16dB tx antenna (probably not at all reasonable
>> due
>> to size and small 50ish* coverage) to a 10 dB cpe antenna.  -80 at 50
>> miles!
>>
>> Same thing with an 8dB (say omni) would be 20 miles at -80.
>>
>> The sad part though?  We can do that with today's wifi gear!  20 miles is
>> pretty easy in the open.
>>
>> Now lets run this at the WISPA 20 WATT level.  That's 43dB eirp.
>>
>> So, 35dB tx power and 8dB omni to 10dB cpe antenna.  I get -80 at 100
>> miles!
>> Now we're talkin!
>>
>> The next question that has to be answered.  What is the receive signal of
>> the average TV set these days?  What does it need to be able to pick up a
>> signal?  We need to know that number if we're to come up with a non
>> interfering OOB level that we can suggest to the FCC.
>>
>> This is why people need to join wispa.  We have to fight this fight. 
>> They
>> are still looking at what to do with us it sounds like.  We have to be
>> ready
>> to go back there again.  We need to show them pictures of our areas,
>> demographics, screen shots of all of the wifi devices we pick up at our
>> ap's.  etc. etc. etc.
>>
>> Pretty cool.
>> marlon
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "WISPA List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:12 AM
>> Subject: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
>>
>>
>>> Based on TV antenna, it looks like the largest gain CPE will be around 
>>> 10
>>> dB for all but the lowest of frequencies.
>>>
>>> I just ran a Radio Mobile coverage area using a guesstimate at a white
>>> spaces system...  EIRP of 20 dBm, 16 dBi sector, 10 dBi CPE, -80 dBm
>>> minimum allowed receive.  The range wasn't much more than 2 miles in 
>>> flat
>>> country land.
>>>
>>> With those same measurements with a 36 dBm EIRP, we have 10 miles, but
>>> terrain comes more into play here.
>>>
>>> For the extreme rural areas, this is where tower height comes into play.
>>> For everyone else, this is your foliage beater.  In these areas we still
>>> need small cells for bandwidth capacity and interference rejection.
>>>
>>> Remember, the only signal levels mentioned were 40 mw for personal
>>> portable devices.  Anything else is just speculation at this point. 
>>> They
>>> may very well give fixed stations 4 W as they do in all other unlicensed
>>> bands.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to