I have to disagree with the below. There's a short, very steep curve at the bottom, but it's not as bad as one might think from his description.
Compared to Mikrotik, it is the model of simplicity. I have used it for the vast majority of everything, from backhauls to ap's to clients, and I have it deployed on 2.4, 5ghz, and 900 mhz. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ <insert witty tagline here> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:36 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Where is StarOS? > > StarOS is a solid environment, but you have to commit yourself to making > it work. Very hard for a startup company to just pick it up and install > it. You have a huge learning curve. The other thing I saw was that > version changes are huge. When going from a V2 OS setup to a V3, There > were huge changes in the OS that took lots of testing and many > adjustments to our system. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
