On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:12:17AM -0600, Sam Tetherow wrote:
> I don't think they are any more complex than MT in fact they are quite a
> bit simpler, however where MT does shine is in the documentation. In
> fact there is so much MT documentation it can be overwhelming at times.
>
MT Documentation is very weak. It's a dim bulb, not a shine. They are
improving with the wiki though. Just now they are getting around to
updating the 3.x documentation by moving it to the wiki. They are off to
a good start and I hope they finish it.
There are lots of things not well documented, mostly featured added in
3.x or things changed over the years. Fetch hasn't been ever been well
documented for example. File naming conventions/rules, BGP docs was
never updated from v2.9 till they recently started putting it on their
wiki. Lots of things offer examples, but no documenting of the feature
options.
If you want good documentation, look at HP Procurve, Cisco IOS and
routers, Alvarion, Redhat, SuSE, Mysql.
--
/*
Jason Philbrook | Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ | Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting
http://f64.nu/ | for Midcoast Maine http://www.midcoast.com/
*/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
