The nicer the antenna, the more critical the aim is. A cheap 900 sector 
will create a forgiving coverage pattern. A nice one like Tiltek or MTI 
will have a well defined coverage pattern in the vertical direction.

Personally, I wouldn't put 900 that high on a tower, as it would receive 
too much interference in my areas. I'd be hesitant to put 900 over 150 
feet. But anything going that high up should be a high quality antenna, 
anything else is false economy in the event it needs repair or 
replacement.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:42:57AM -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> I disagree,  Precise Tilt does matter quite a bit with Tiltek 900Mhz 
> sectors.
> 
> Let me give an example of mounted at 400ft with Tiltek sectors having 17 deg 
> vert beamwidth.
> 
> 8 deg downtilt, min .25 miles, max horizon.
> 
> 9 degree downtilt, min .24 miles, max 8.6 miles.
> 
> 10 degree downtilt, Min distance .22 miles, Max distance 2.8 miles.
> 
> 11 deg downtilt, min .21 miles, Max 1.7 miles
> 
> Near field coverage is rarely a problem with 900Mhz, regardless of the tilt.
> But what people forget is how much the far field is effected by just a 
> single degree.
> 
> The difference between 9 versus10 degrees is the difference of "5 miles !" 
> coverage at optimal signal strength.
> The difference between 8 versus 10 degrees is the difference of whether you 
> interfere with your other towers 30 miles away versus 3 miles away.
> 
> With 900Mhz, EVERY DB counts. The reason is two fold.  1) The noise floor is 
> ften high. 2) Its very easy to get colocated AP antenna self interference, 
> when foliage can degrade the signal of a single link severally. For example, 
> the Front-to-back isolation loss could be equivellent to the loss of foliage 
> in a path.
> 
> The goal is to get the highest signal uniformally to the largest area within 
> your desired coverage area. Then you can always lower CPE transmit power as 
> needed on links without foliage loss.  In my 900 deployments, I have found 
> that 3db lost or gained can be the difference between a typically good 
> versus bad link.
> 
> Now, its true the above beamwidths are only the distances that show "3 db" 
> loss, so a 10 degree downtilt, sector will still have a significant amount 
> of signal going out to and heard from the the horizon. But every DB counts.
> 
> The critical question becomes do you mount high or not? Higher avoids more 
> trees. HIgher hears more interference. We found what was best for us was to 
> go higher, but add more downtilt. We shoot for 10 degree downtilt. But it 
> can be a delicate balance, dependent on your environment and noise levels 
> and locations. We will usally put a larger focus on reducing noise to our 
> adjacent cell sites, even if at the cost of gain to our intended coverage 
> area.
> 
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Cliff Olle" <[email protected]>
> To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:25 PM
> Subject: [WISPA] 900 Downtilt at 300'
> 
> 
> > For the 900 Mhz connectorized AP (by cyclone) with the 120 tiltek antenna,
> > if I am mounted at 300', what amount of down tilt is normal?
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG.
> > Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1991 - Release Date: 3/9/2009 
> > 7:14 AM
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
    KB1IOJ        |   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Maine    http://www.midcoast.com/
*/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to