Most of my residential users use way more than my business users. The 
businesses do not allow for watching hulu, netflix, and YouTube when they are 
supposed to be working. I would have to almost reverse your 20/60 statement. In 
the last year or two, residential usage has gone way above the business usage 
in my area.

Scottie

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Charles Wu <[email protected]>
Reply-To: WISPA General List <[email protected]>
Date:  Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:50:37 -0500

>Which begs an interesting point -- how much revenue / AP?
>
>I would think $5k / month for a 20 MHz chunk of 5.8 spectrum, while a bit on 
>the higher side, isn't an unreasonable goal
>
>Using Canopy...you have 14 Mb aggregate
>
>Selling for $50 / month residential -- that's 100 customers sharing 14 Mb
>Splitting between $100 / month business and $50 / month residential (for 
>better traffic shaping) -- that's now
>
>20 business customers during the day time (8-5)
>60 residential customers in the afternoon / evening (4-12)
>
>Now obviously, there will always be places where you're shooting into a hole, 
>or there aren't that many homes / business being covered, blah blah blah blah 
>-- but I don't think $5k / month / AP is an unreasonable goal
>
>Thoughts? Comments?
>
>-Charles
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
>Of Scott Carullo
>Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 5:56 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Throughput Licensed vs. Unlicensed
>
>
>This has been an outstanding thread I have enjoyed reading - and learned a 
>bit in the process...  thanks.
>
>I'll just add that while we are trying to keep the numbers trained to a 
>common wisp - either you guys have a lucky horse shoe or achieving a 
>$5000/mo revenue on one ap is a bit outside the avg...  At least for 
>discussion sake.  But - even at 1/5th of that your argument still holds 
>true for the most part.  Its just that you add in 900mhz (not as common) 
>and all the lower power 5Ghz spectrum available now, 2.4Ghz etc and also 
>mention you can run MT stuff on 10Mhz channels and you just effectively 
>doubled your options based on what type of clients you are servicing etc... 
> Then theres radios that have GPS sync for spectrum reuse etc and the 
>conversation starts to get a lot more complex :)
>
>But, in any case this has been an eye-opening discussion...  
>
>Scott Carullo
>Brevard Wireless
>321-205-1100 x102
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>> From: "Charles Wu" 
><IMCEAEX-_O=CTI_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29
>[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 2:47 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] High Throughput Licensed vs. Unlicensed
>> 
>> >I do see Travis's point about the longer range shots, however.   I've 
>> >got a 35, 45 and 65 mile shots with StarOS and they work just fine but 
>> >only put out about 18-25meg at those distances.   That's enough for me, 
>
>> >but I can see where you would want more capacity and I suppose that 
>> >within that narrow definition, a PTP600 would be better than a licensed 
>
>> >link.
>> 
>> Make no mistake, the PTP600, even though it's almost 5 years old, is 
>still one (if not the) best UL radio on the market from a pure 
>technological perspective -- no other radio has it's combination of 1024FFT 
>OFDM, Space-Time-Coding, MIMO, etc
>> 
>> Makes you wonder what planet Motorola / Orthogon raided to get the 
>engineers who built that radio =)
>> 
>> And I'm sure many on the list can attest to the wonderful things that a 
>PTP600 does / can do
>> 
>> However, the discussion has to come back to the reality that we don't 
>work for the government (and can't print money or write stimulus bills on a 
>whim), and as a result, have to figure out a way to make a buck so we can 
>feed the dog, buy gas, pay for those ski trips in Utah...
>> 
>> That said, we get back to "bang for buck" or "good enough"
>> 
>> True, the PTP600 will generally work for all scenarios, but it's akin to 
>killing a bug with a nuclear warhead -- it's a lot more cost effective (and 
>there's less collateral damage) if you just step on it with your shoe
>> 
>> So, for the 1% of times when you need to shoot 50+ miles while bouncing 
>off 2 different mountains, the PTP600 will be your best bet
>> 
>> But for the other 90% of the time, when you have a 10-20 mile shot and 
>want something that reliable, carrier-class, and interference / spectrum 
>isn't an issue, many are using Mikrotiks / StarOS / Trango Atlas / name 
>your own cheap but decent proprietary Atheros-based system out there
>> 
>> Now, I'm personally extremely cheap, but the argument is over because you 
>can't just look at up-front price because long-term cost is just as (if not 
>more) important when talking about WISP networks
>> 
>> That said, being a slow day, it's worth exercising one's mind to analyze 
>possible "what-if" alternative situations -- bear with me here and follow 
>my logic here...
>> 
>> The MOST VALUABLE ASSET of any WISP is HIGH POWER MULTIPOINT SPECTRUM 
>(b/c ultimately, it's the only thing that generates revenue, and like it or 
>not, the #1 determinant in valuing a WISP, or any business for the matter, 
>is EBITDA)
>> 
>> In optimal conditions, there's 125 MHz of clean spectrum (6 channels)
>> Assuming you can make $5k / month per AP (or channel) -- as spectrum gets 
>limited, the decision will ultimately boil down to
>> 
>> 1. Pay $2k for a cheap Atheros based backhaul to bring 30 Mb to your 
>tower and lose 1 channel (or $5k / month in revenue)
>> 
>> 2. Run that backhaul in turbo mode, get 50 Mb at your tower, and now lose 
>2 channels (or $10k / month in revenue)
>> 
>> 3. Pay an extra $10k for a LICENSED BACKHAUL that frees up more spectrum 
>for multipoint, and never have to worry about interference on your backhaul 
>ever again -- and make an extra $5-10k / month b/c you can add more 
>customers on your tower
>> 
>> Some food for thought =)
>> 
>> -Charles
>> 
>> 
>> 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>>  
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> 
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
>
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>http://signup.wispa.org/
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>http://signup.wispa.org/
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>

Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to