I will invite any 3.65 Mfg to let me test their gear in my environment. I have 
found nothing to work past 2 miles in the hills and trees of TN, except 900 Mhz 
Canopy.

Scottie 

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Mike Cowan" <mi...@wirelessconnections.net>
Reply-To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Date:  Fri, 5 Jun 2009 07:24:53 -0400

>It is true that a 802.11 based 3.650 product is not going to be any better
>than 2.4.  A wimax based 3.650 product is going to gve field performance
>much like 2.4.  A diversity based 3.650 system is going to provide coverage
>much like, and oftentimes exceeding that of 900Mhz.  These observations are
>based on real field deployments in diverse terrain across the US.
>
>Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>Mike Cowan
>Wireless Connections
>A Division of ACC
>166 Milan Ave
>Norwalk, OH  44857
>419-660-6100
>419-706-7348 Cell
>419-668-4077 Fax
>mi...@wirelessconnections.net
>www.wirelessconnections.net
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Travis Johnson
>Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 1:33 AM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Wimax
>
>Hi,
>
>We have two small 3.65 repeaters (serving only other small WiPOPs). The 
>3.65 does work, but our experience was that it did not do any better in 
>NLOS than 2.4ghz would already do (when comparing the same type of radio 
>systems). There are several other radio features and "tricks" that the 
>higher-end WiMax companies are doing to get better NLOS, but it is still 
>not comparable to 900mhz.
>
>In our area, there is a provider using 2.5ghz licensed WiMax and they 
>still have NLOS issues where our 900mhz Trango system will work just 
>fine. YMMV.
>
>Travis
>Microserv
>
>Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Several months ago I paid the small fee for the 365 "license" but have not
>> used it. We are looking to deploy something that has a little less
>> interference since there is quite a bit of 900mhz and 5.8ghz equipment
>> deployed where we are.   Has anyone tested any of this equipment and how
>has
>> it worked.  Also does it possess any NLOS capabilities (I know all the
>> manufacturers claim they do).
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jeremie Chism
>> Triton Communications
>>
>>
>>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>>  
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>   
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>http://signup.wispa.org/
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
> 
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>http://signup.wispa.org/
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>


Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as $30.00/mth.
Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to