Why you would route AT the AP boggles my mind... Routing Before the AP is the way to go.
Why add additional load on an AP when it should be working on sending and receiving wireless data. ryan Rick Kunze wrote: > I've got about 50 or 60 CPQ's and SL2's out there, as well as a dozen or > so 6000's, some for up to 4 or 5 years. > > I've never had a single problem with any of them failing to pass traffic > as mentioned in the thread. I just upgraded one small town to 4.0.2, a > couple 6000's and a couple dozen CPE's in router/NAT mode. No calls > from any customers . . . everything seems normal. > > IMO, the Tranzeo stuff has been fine. All AP's however are bridged in > my case. > > Rk > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
