jp wrote: > About time. torrent has to be about the most inefficient way to share > data; blindly transferring stuff from the ends of the Internet instead > of from localized or centralized sources which are always faster and > cheaper per meg.
To the end-user, bandwidth is bandwidth, doesn't matter where it comes from. (At least in the context of, say, a torrent application, where latency isn't an important factor.) For me, "improvement" would be a BitTorrent client that didn't completely thrash a wireless AP with its insistence on running up five hundred packets-per-second, eating up the radio time and making other customers on that AP call me to complain. :) David Smith MVN.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
