Answer to Rubens' post on September 18th. Please let us know if you have any further questions regarding the Winlink1000 or Radwin2000. Matt Musial Radwin, Director of Sales Cell- 562-659-1358
Radwin's radios consists of 802.11a or 802.11n modem chipset wrapped up with proprietary radio technology, powerful processor and software based signal processing algorithm. Every single radio goes thru comprehensive testing including burn in to validate compliance to the specification across temperature range. The result is robust high performance carrier class radio: - Low constant latency regardless of distance (important for WISPs who plan to offer voice and other real time services) - High PPS (packet per second) capability - Very low packet error rate (PER) and bit error rate (BER) even under interference. - And much more All that is offered at unmatched unbeatable price!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yes there are some vendors that brag about their proprietary technology. However proprietary technology does not guarantee performance and reliability. But it is defiantly ensures high cost as they cannot leverage on the economy of scale that off the shelf modem offers. Ilan Moshe, EE President Radwin Inc. >-----Original Message----- >From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl >Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 9:13 PM >To: WISPA General List >Subject: [WISPA] RAD/Radwin x Wi-Fi > >I'm trying to figure out what's "under the hood" of Radwin >Winlink-1000 / RAD AirMux-200 and the MIMO model Radwin-2000 / RAD >AirMux-400, in order to better understand what traffic patterns may >or may not be suited to these radios. > >Although costly backhaul vendors (Redline, Motorola) keep telling me >that RAD/Radwin are Wi-Fi based, my testing of them insist on telling >me otherwise... for instance, AirMux-200 pass with flying colors thru >RFC-2544 performance testing with maximum performance (18 Mbps) even >for 64 byte frames (27 kpps), which is a very good pps rate compared >to the 2kpps of a Ubiquiti Nanostation (non-M). > >Data rates are indeed similar comparing AirMux-200 to 802.11a, >although Radwin tops at 48 Mbps air rate, not 54 Mbps; the MIMO model >have data rates that look very much like the MCS8-15 802.11n data >rates, suggesting that there are indeed some Wi-Fi heritage in the >product, no matter what the tests say. > >Any ideas on what is going down to the bit level ? > > >Rubens > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >-------- >WISPA Wants You! Join today! >http://signup.wispa.org/ >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >-------- > >WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
