I am interested in hearing more once deployed. I have some MT N gear hung and I have found that it is more sensitive to environmental RF than standard A links. If you are in RF busy area N may not be realistic option, at least that's my preliminary conclusion :) Send us the info once you do more tests out in the field, it would be nice to have inexpensive fast gear as another option...
Scott Carullo Brevard Wireless 321-205-1100 x102 -------- Original Message -------- > From: "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 12:59 PM > To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> > Subject: [WISPA] Preliminary test report on UBNT rocket units > > We bought some ubiquiti new M series gear to do some testing and verify > if it could be a replacement for some PTP links > > > > Our first bench test was done with the Rocket M Radio, its 11n and it > uses both polarities, > > > > Using a 10 mhz channel, on the bench we get about 29 Mbps one way, 35 > Mbps both ways TCP with Mikrotik BW test via routers on each end point. > > > > More to come > > > > Gino A. Villarini > [email protected] > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
