The Ethernet setup for the Alvarion VL is nice same as other VL units. However the SU-VL-900 units only come in a SU-E form required the use of external antenna. I'm fine with this, but one thing to keep in mind. I hope the will have the option for the future with a built in 9 or 10dbi antenna but for now, just external.
-Cameron -----Original Message----- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ron Calhoun Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Waverider Vs Alvarion VL 900 The last I check waverider was claiming their ccu8000 would push 13mbps. I have used the CCU8000 with the eum8000 and was only able to pull a 4mb test from the ccu. At that point the customer was thrilled. 4mbps beats dialup any day. But the point remains that I was only able to get 4mbps. On a side note if you are considering Waverider equipment. Invest in rubber tape and dielectric grease. I have a whole shed full of dead radios because water got into the ethernet connector. Good luck, Ron On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Cameron Kilton <c...@midcoast.com> wrote: > So far, I'm a huge fan of the Alvarion VL 900. The latest revision is > much better than the original release. Speeds are quite impressive. We > have not tested it yet, but supposed to do up to 8mbit in a 5mhz > channel. Assuming you get a real clean channel. > > -Cameron > > -----Original Message----- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of my_em...@webjogger.net > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 5:24 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: [WISPA] Waverider Vs Alvarion VL 900 > > Hi, > > We're planning to upgrade a lot of our 900MHz equipment which is > currently predominantly Alvarion Breeze Access 900. The main goal is to > provide the customer with better speeds > > The 2 options I'm considering are Alvarion VL900 and Waverider CCU8000 > > I was wondering if anyone has experience with using both of these > radios, and if so, all considered which one do you think is generally > better? > > Thanks, > > -- > Jon Roux > Webjogger Internet Services > http://www.webjogger.net > 845.757.4000 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
