You were watching live streaming video from the cruiser?  That's impressive,
for sure.  I'll find out what sort of little requirements they themselves
have and if they want to go ahead then talk to the state people.  It's a
small little pond.... I'm sure the fish have all sorts of crazy dreams that
won't have much to do with the main purpose of doing this but we'll see.
Thanks again, Butch.  

Hey any way of putting an IP activated switch on the lights and siren just
to mess with the guy from time to time?  Or activating the PA speaker and
have it broadcast the theme from My Little Pony or Ice Cream Truck
music?????

Just asking, that's all..........  



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 2:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ideas on Police Department Wireless Link from Station
to Cruiser

On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 11:45 -0600, 3-dB Networks wrote: 
> IMHO, the only way to do something like this where the office is mobile is
> with cellular service 

I have done this MANY times without cellular and without mesh.  Cellular
is too expensive and WAY too slow to be really very useful.  Mesh is
simply not needed for what MOST of them need.  

> or to use a Mesh network designed for mobility (since 802.11G tends to
fall
> apart past 30MPH or so).

You are thinking that an officer of the law is gonna be using the
network while driving at 30MPH+?  If their need is to have it working
that way, then I would agree that it may be necessary to increase
coverage.  

> Unless this city want's to make a major investment in Mesh... I'd tell him
> to stick with the cellular air cards (Verizon, AT&T, whatever) and be done
> with it.  

In some cases, these networks have been paid for with Homeland Security
$$.  No cost to the city.

> Hacking together a solution is probably more effort than its
> worth, and there could be theoretical consequences if the network doesn't
> operate correctly.

Of course.  It's all about explaining benefits and pitfalls.  Once the
network needs are known (which they are not at this point), THEN a
solution is devised.

For what it's worth, the second time I did this type of network, we
watched a LIVE streaming video from one cop car as it drove all over
town without more than a 1 second hiccup (which happened 2 times).
Additionally, he was talking to us via an 802.11g wireless voip phone
and NEVER lost the call.  This was using a mixture of 2.4GHz 802.11b,
802.11g and 900MHz (Mikrotik 802.11a I think), if you're interested.
Not too bad for not having purchased, or even considered Moto.  I think
to dismiss a technology outright before understanding what good
engineering can do is pretty short sighted.

-- 
********************************************************************
* Butch Evans                   * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/    * Network Engineering              *
* http://www.wispa.org/         * Wired or Wireless Networks       *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *
********************************************************************



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to