Spent another couple minutes on this link today.  This is really strange...

The 58DP end, when in 802.11a mode actually picks up a few other sites, at
decent signal.  About what I'd expect to pick up the other sites at.

The 58DP w/ shroud end, which is right downtown picks up nothing.  At all.
It should be picking up a bunch of garbage from everywhere.
So that leaves the question... is the shroud so well designed, and the dish
so high-performance, that it's not picking up anything because of its
design?
Is the alignment super-tight on the dish with shroud?  Nobody checked the
plumb-ness of the arm before sticking the dish on it, maybe that's why the
elevation angles are different from both ends?
Maybe I should try taking the dish w/ shroud out of the equation, and just
stick a rootenna on that end or something, just to test with?

Any ideas or help appreciated
Jayson

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Jayson Baker <[email protected]> wrote:

> I will try that.  The link is clear.  One end atop a 12-story building.
> The other end is on the side of a house.
> Elevation at the building is about 6200', house is probably around 9000'
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 6 dB difference at the ends?  It sounds like the weaker link might be
>> seeing an incidental signal from a reflection source.  Have you tried
>> setting the link to 20 MHz or 10 MHz channels?  If it is severe
>> multipath a minor change in height may make a big difference.  Water
>> tower or big steel building close to the link?
>>
>> At 01:41 PM 10/7/2009, you wrote:
>> >Yeah, we flipped polarity.  It's an 802.11n link, so shouldn't "matter"
>> but
>> >changed anyway.  No difference.  Tried chain 0, chain 1, chain 0+1, no
>> >difference.
>> >
>> >Cables came from Tessco, are brand Wireless Solutions I think.  3' long.
>> >Times cable, but look like RFI connectors.  The bag they came in said
>> >"professionally assembled and tested" - we've used the same on other
>> sites
>> >without issue.
>> >
>> >The feed assembly looks to be in correctly.  Not much way to screw that
>> up
>> >on these antennas.  My concern of one being bad or something is related
>> to
>> >the fact that 2-degrees on one end, and 8-degrees on another seems really
>> >odd.
>> >
>> >lol, I don't think the other site is further down than this site is up.
>> >
>> >Jayson
>> >
>> >On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Randy Cosby <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I assume you checked for reverse polarization?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Jayson Baker wrote:
>> > > > Got back to both ends of our WB 5.8GHz links today.
>> > > >
>> > > > RadioMobile says it's 10km, we should have 5-degrees up/down tilt,
>> and
>> > > using
>> > > > the WB dishes see -59dBm.
>> > > >
>> > > > We're seeing only -80dBm on both polarities.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cables are new, professionally made and tested.  Pigtails are new,
>> > > tested.
>> > > > Radios are new, tested.
>> > > >
>> > > > WB dishes... on one end, we have up-tilt of about 2 degrees.
>> > > > On the other end, we have down-tilt of about 8 degrees.
>> > > > Moving a couple degress each way (or, setting both at 5, like RM
>> says)
>> > > gets
>> > > > almost no signal at all.
>> > > >
>> > > > One is WB 58DP, one is the same, but with the high-performance
>> shroud.
>> > > >
>> > > > Any thoughts?  Bad antenna on one end?
>> > > >
>> > > > Jayson
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >  >
>> > >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> > > > http://signup.wispa.org/
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> > > >
>> > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> > > http://signup.wispa.org/
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> > >
>> > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> >http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> >
>> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to