I don't remember the email conversation, but it's very interesting and I'll be 
looking at upgrading some units evidently to the latest version.....with a 
backup plan.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Kurt Fankhauser" <k...@wavelinc.com>
Reply-To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Date:  Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:07:51 -0500

>Well I don't know if many of you remember this issue but after about a year
>of back and forth with Tranzeo and them playing the blame game on weather or
>not there was an issue with CPQ/SL2's while running in router mode and the
>NAT tables getting full, this issue has finally been solved!
>
> 
>
>The issue was apparently due to the units not having enough onboard RAM
>while running in router mode.
>
>Firmware version 5.0.4 - reduced the connection tables timeout values
>significantly. I consider this a band-aid fix but it does fix the problem
>and I'm happy.
>
>Firmware version 5.0.2 - still had the problem with the NAT tables getting
>full.
>
> 
>
>Now here is where things get interesting.
>
>Firmware version 5.0.3 - this version is not anywhere on the website for
>download. Newer CPQ19's and possible SL2's are shipping with firmware 5.0.3.
>A unit with this firmware will not upgrade to 5.0.4. If you try it then it
>says that it is incompatible version. So I'm thinking what the heck? I can't
>upgrade to the version that fixed the NAT problem right so I'm screwed!?!
>WRONG, started digging around in the Tranzeo readme files and version 5.0.3
>says this "5.0.3 was created solely to facilitate changes on Tranzeo's
>Production Line. There are no feature differences between 5.0.2 and 5.0.3." 
>
> 
>
>So they changed the production line huh? You are wondering what that means
>right? They ADDED MORE RAM TO THESE NEWER BOARDS. Thus fixing the problem,
>that's why there is no difference between version 5.0.2 and 5.0.3!!!!
>
>(see file attached log.JPG)
>
> 
>
>Check this out all newer boards have the this following name in the software
>"TR6-5.0.3CPQ-HWr3"
>
> 
>
>HWr3??? Guessing that means Hardware Version 3
>
>(see file attached HWr3.JPG)
>
> 
>
>So they still haven't publicly come out and said "Hey yes there was a
>problem, but now its fixed." And they probably never will admit it. I'm
>guessing this is so the shareholders don't get spooked. Anyways I'm just
>glad that its fixed. I remember loosing customers 2 years ago over this
>issue before I even knew that the Tranzeo CPE was at fault.
>
> 
>
>Just my 2 cents
>
> 
>
>Kurt Fankhauser
>WAVELINC
>P.O. Box 126
>Bucyrus, OH 44820
>419-562-6405
>www.wavelinc.com
>
> 
>
> 
>
>  _____  
>
>From: Bill Todd [mailto:re...@smartburst.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 8:56 AM
>To: Kurt Fankhauser
>Subject: Re: [WISP] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>
> 
>
>Kurt,
>
>Snicker....no.
>
>Talked to them at length. Gave them access to our network.  SNMP and the
>whole deal. Lot's of test driving, ooohhhs and aahhhs and remarks like, "We
>found some interesting things."  Then...nothing  but crickets chirping.  
>
>We have rolled back all units and are continuing to migrate away from their
>products.  It's a shame.
>
>900 mhz units seemed to get messed up the most by 4.02. Can't tell you why.
>Some had to go back to Tranzeo.  
>
>Bill
>SmartBurst
>
>Kurt Fankhauser wrote: 
>
>Bill,
>
> 
>
>Have you found a solution to this yet? Tranzeo seems to have been doing
>nothing as newest firmware release still has the problem.
>
> 
>
>Kurt Fankhauser
>WAVELINC
>P.O. Box 126
>Bucyrus, OH 44820
>419-562-6405
>www.wavelinc.com
>
> 
>
> 
>
>  _____  
>
>From: Bill Todd [mailto:re...@smartburst.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:40 AM
>To: Kurt Fankhauser
>Subject: Re: [WISP] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>
> 
>
>Getting customers back online first. 
>
>Our owner will likely do that, but will forward your email to him. 
>
>-Bill
>
>Kurt Fankhauser wrote: 
>
>Have you emailed Tranzeo Support on this issue? What was their response? If
>you havn't you need to email them and CC: me because they apparently are not
>even working on this issue.
>
> 
>
>Kurt Fankhauser
>WAVELINC
>P.O. Box 126
>Bucyrus, OH 44820
>419-562-6405
>www.wavelinc.com
>
> 
>
> 
>
>  _____  
>
>From: wisp-ow...@part-15.org [mailto:wisp-ow...@part-15.org] On Behalf Of
>Bill Todd
>Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:13 AM
>To: w...@part-15.org
>Subject: Re: [WISP] Latest Tranzeo Firmware = Broken NAT ???
>
> 
>
>We are seeing that too, same thing it isn't on all radios with 4.02, but
>enough of them that it's now officially breaking working radios. We only
>upgraded to fix non responsive GUI, (and liked the config backup option) but
>we won't do ANY more of these.  Gotta go swap out customer radio this
>morning.  It's a 6019.
>
>Kurt Fankhauser wrote: 
>
>All was running fine on our CPE's running version 3.6.7 and did the upgrade
>to version 4.0.2. Now every CPE that is running in router mode doing NAT
>will randomly not pass new traffic. Example: running a constant ping to the
>AP all of the sudden will start dropping pings. But the funny thing is that
>if you are doing a download the download will not be interrupted at all. Try
>to check email or bring up a new page and nothing. After a while the pings
>will start replying and then normal surfing will resume.
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>This problem took forever to diagnose and finally narrowed it down to the
>new 4.0.2 Tranzeo firmware running on CPQ's and SL2's only while doing NAT.
>
>The temporary fix for clients that have noticed the problem is to set the
>Tranzeo back up into bridge mode. Once in bridge mode all problems go away.
>
>All access points are Mikrotik based running 3.15 firmware. This problem
>does not happen on a Mikrotik based CPE doing NAT.
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Been emailing Tranzeo tech support for over a week and they are again
>playing the blame game and pointing the finger at Mikrotik telling me that
>Mikrotik doesn't do double NAT even though double NAT has been working fine
>for the past 5 years until now. Running NAT on the CPE side and then on the
>core router.
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Can anyone else verify this as Tranzeo claims that they can not reproduce in
>the lab.
>
> 
>
>Kurt Fankhauser
>WAVELINC
>P.O. Box 126
>Bucyrus, OH 44820
>419-562-6405
>www.wavelinc.com
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>
 




________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
                   


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to