Why not WDS? On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Jerry Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > same ssid = yes > same channel = no. use 1, 6, 11 > wds = no > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 3, 2010, at 2:30 PM, "Steve Barnes" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have a hotel that it takes 3 AP to cover well. I am going to use >> 3 MT411 all wired back to a RB450 router for hotspot. I plan to set >> all the 411 to bridged and all the same channel and SSID. Is this >> the best way. Is there any reason to do WDS? >> >> Steve Barnes >> RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service >> >> >> --- >> --- >> --- >> --- >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> --- >> --- >> --- >> --- >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
