Your old provider may be trying to have the gateway for your new IPs on their router instead of routing them to your router.
IE, your old setup probably looked like this: Provider router->/30->Your router->/24 for your customers. New setup would be: Provider router->/24->Your router(NAT)->different /24 Personally, I'd ask the provider to route your IPs to your router over a /30 so you can split them up as needed. We would refuse any circuit where the provider didn't do that. -Jon On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jeremie Chism <[email protected]> wrote: > I know my fair share of networking but I leave our cisco routers to > the professionals. One question. Not very long ago we switched to a > new backbone provider. Before I could assign public IP addresses > directly to routers or cpe. Now my netowrk guy said we have to do > static nat. Why would this be? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
