And think like the ham radio operators do in condo environments - conceal gear 
in everyday objects which pass condo association muster like flower pots, flag 
poles, bird feeders, fake bathroom roof vents etc.

Greg

On May 28, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:

> Plenty of free advice on this list, no problem there.
> 
> Two general rules are RF does not go through dirt (aka hill), period.
> And High frequencies like 5.x Ghz does not penetrate hard surfaces like 
> brick and cement, and does not really penetrate anything well, so does not 
> penetrate wood either unless very high power.
> 
> If you need to make a Non-Line-of-Sight shot and shoot through a structure 
> you are going to have to use 900Mhz.
> 
> However, there are alternatives, such as reflection. OFDM's core benefit was 
> to better accept multi-path reflections to enable a combined signal without 
> interference.
> It accomplishes this by having a larger time window to allow for all 
> reflected signals of the same data to arrive.
> 
> If there are other tall building to the side of the building blocking you, 
> with enough gap between them, you may be able to bounce the siganl off of 
> one of them to reach the desired building.
> 
> However, the first thing I'd question is why you'd try this in the first 
> place. Wouldn't it be better to just mount on top of the taller building? 
> That would be a "relay" site.
> The tall building would have two radios, each with a panel antenna, one 
> looking down to the shorter buildings in the valley, and one looking to the 
> remote building that will have the gateway to the alternate Internet 
> provider backbone.   There is no replacement for gaining a good hassle-free 
> Line-of-Sight connection, if there is a way to accomplish it. Radios are 
> inexpesnive, support afterwords may not be.  Where I can understand 
> compromises that may need to be had along the distribution between all the 
> buildings, but its generally not good practice to compromise on a head end 
> critical link that feeds all the others.
> 
> 
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shaddi Hasan" <[email protected]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:48 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] Short-range NLOS question
> 
> 
>> Hello WISPA,
>> 
>> I'm a lurker on this list that is interested in the WISP industry but 
>> still
>> learning every day (a lot from you all!), so please forgive my ignorance. 
>> :)
>> 
>> I run a small community wireless network in a low-income apartment 
>> complex;
>> we're currently using Open-Mesh
>> OM1P<http://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=OM1P&eq=&Tp=%20>'s
>> with 7dBi omnis to provide coverage to a couple hundred families in about 
>> 25
>> buildings. For reasons that aren't relevant to this discussion and can't 
>> be
>> changed, we may only place our mesh AP's inside resident's apartments 
>> (this
>> is an all-volunteer operation, run on a shoestring with a small grant). We
>> can place AP's outside on people's windows, but we have to be discreet.
>> 
>> There's one section of the complex that we haven't been able to get 
>> coverage
>> to. It's in a bit of a depression, so the tops of the buildings in the
>> hollow are about even with the first floor of the ones higher up. We have 
>> a
>> gateway for our mesh there, a CLEAR WiMax connection, that never stays up
>> (we have another one on top of the hill that does stay up, but would that
>> there were another WISP in our area...), so we are thinking about building 
>> a
>> P2P link between that section of the complex and our gateways elsewhere, a
>> few hundred feet away but blocked by part of this hill and several
>> buildings.
>> 
>> Because we're on such a tight budget, I wanted to solicit yall's advice
>> before we made a purchase. We were thinking about using a a couple 5Ghz
>> Ubiquiti NS's, but I'm not sure how well that will work given the lack of
>> LOS. We were also thinking about looking for some inexpensive 900Mhz
>> devices, but I'm not sure if that's overkill for what we're trying to do.
>> We're not trying to get free consulting from you all, but if anyone has 
>> any
>> pointers that might help us make a better decision or fix this problem
>> they'd be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Shaddi
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> 
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to