I have setup Unbound with DNSSEC. Oddly enough, both NameBench and DNS Benchmark report my Windows DNS server as faster than Unbound, while Unbound is faster than my previous BIND setup.
DNS Benchmark consistently rates my local servers faster than anything else on the Internet, while NameBench reported most of its public servers as faster than mine. Ideas as to why? I didn't check to see if there were any overlaps in the public DNS servers they used. Too many IPs to compare. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 5/26/2010 11:40 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > I am setting up some new DNS servers and I'd like to figure out what the > quickest caching DNS server is. Google keeps telling me to go to Open > DNS. I'm not opposed to them and may use them as either primary or > secondary, but I want at least one server within my own network. > > Recommendations? > > Separately, I will be setting up a resolving server for my own stuff. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
