Make sure you are running the most recent version of 5.2 firmware.....also you 
need to be running then in AP-WDS and CPE-WDS mode. 

Faisal

On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Jayson Baker <jay...@spectrasurf.com> wrote:

> I didn't quite follow all of that, it must be too early.
> But I can tell you we have 4 of the PtP UBNT links using their M-series.  3
> of those OSPF fine.  The other won't OSPF for the life of me.  All same
> config and firmware on all units.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Scott Lambert <lamb...@lambertfam.org>wrote:
> 
>> We have been putting up some Ubiquity RocketM5 point-to-point bridge
>> links, running airos 5.2, lately to replace some overloaded StarOS
>> backhauls.  Where these links have gone in, we static route the traffic
>> across them.  They happen to be on the OSPF/OLSR divider boundry.  I
>> would like to find a good way to redistribute between the routing
>> protocols, but that's for another day.  When I get time, I'll probably
>> just convert the 20 odd OLSR towers to OSPF.
>> 
>> These are our first experience with Ubiquity.  The first two were no
>> muss, no fuss.  The third link went up nicely.  It's configured the same
>> as the other two links.  About an hour after we plugged the local end
>> at our office into the main switch, rather than a laptop, we started
>> loosing routes to sites which pass through the tower at the far end of
>> the link.
>> 
>> All hosts on the tower LAN can see each other.  We can reach all of
>> them from anywhere else on our network.  It is just routes for hosts
>> connected wirelessly to that tower which are no longer known to the
>> staros box which has the existing backhaul to our office.
>> 
>> We rebooted everything at the remote tower.  The links came up.  The
>> routes were good.  Approximately an hour later, the same routes fell
>> out.  So, we decided it must be due to some sort of wierd multicast OLSR
>> issue when these towers were suddenly able to see each other across
>> the bridges.  I unplugged the ethernet at the office and waited until
>> tonight to try again.  The routes straightened themselves out as soon as
>> I unplugged the office end.  Wild.
>> 
>> This afternoon, I setup a seperate VLAN on the switch for this link.
>> Before I left the office I plugged it in about, 8:00pm.  I didn't have
>> any other devices configured on that VLAN.
>> 
>> There were no problems for several hours until I configured the new VLAN
>> on the Cisco that was sometime between 1:01 and 1:10am.  The RANCID
>> run at 1:01 didn't see any changes but the run at 2:01 found them.  At
>> 1:10am Nagios noticed that it couldn't reach the equipment through those
>> same routes.
>> 
>> + interface GigabitEthernet0/3.13
>> +  description "Wireless VPN 3
>> +  encapsulation dot1Q 13
>> +  ip address 10.127.3.1 255.255.255.0
>> +  no cdp enable
>> + !
>> 
>> That's the subnet for the RocketM5s.  The StarOS gear on the tower uses
>> a public /29 subnet.
>> 
>> I tried various things with reboots and restarts of OLSR on the staros
>> gear at the tower.  The routes came back for four or five minutes then
>> went away again.  No good.
>> 
>> So, at about 2:10am, I logged into the RocketM5 at the tower and
>> disabled it's ethernet interface.  Within a few seconds, my pings to
>> equipment through the lost routes began succeeding.
>> 
>> It's now 3:25, and all's well.  I am puzzled.  We really need the
>> additional bandwidth the ubiquity link can give us on this link.
>> 
>> At 3:26 I enabled the LAN at the tower just to make sure.  Within 2
>> minutes, splat.  This time I left the LAN enabled at the tower and
>> disabled the WLAN interface at the office.  All better in seconds.
>> 
>> Administratively shutting down interface gig0/3.13 at the office seems
>> to be enough to heal OLSR at the tower.  If the tower LAN can see the
>> cisco, we drop routes.  But the other ubiquity links connect back to the
>> same cisco at the office.
>> 
>> I think we will probably replace the switch at the tower tomorrow to see
>> if it has problems we haven't tickled before.  I'm stumped.  Does anyone
>> else have any ideas?
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Scott Lambert                    KC5MLE                       Unix SysAdmin
>> lamb...@lambertfam.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> 
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> 
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to