Also,

Keep in mind that we offer free 477 data prep in a program on our web site.
Go to www.wispmon.com and click on the FCC  477 Util.. You can even download
a free desktop geocoder to pre-geocode your data (makes things go a little
faster in the form prep). No "proprietary" info has to be given. We don't
share data with anyone, ever. There is some prep work involved on your end,
but it would have to be done regardless of how you chose to get the data.
Instructions for use are on the page.

Regards,

Cameron

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Fred Goldstein <fgoldst...@ionary.com>wrote:

>  At 7/28/2010 12:59 PM, you wrote:
>
> *- would reduce or deny support to wireline incumbents in areas where at
> least 75% of households can receive voice and broadband from a competitive
> provider that does not receive support
> *
> Ø  Now the way I read the above statement is that if a WISP covers 75% of a
> current USF recipients service area, there will no longer be eligibility to
> receive USF funds. Remember if they have broadband they also have access to
> many VOIP providers even if you do not provide VOIP services. Vonage and
> Skype come to mind, not to mention cellular coverage. *This would be a
> huge factor in leveling the playing field for WISP’s in rural markets!
> *
> That is the way I see it too!
>
>
> I don't.  See page 22 of the bill (scanned version only on line, alas;
> emphasis added):
>
> "...the Commission determines that at least 75% of the households can
> purchase **wireline** voice service and **wired** high-speed broadband
> service from an unsupported, facilities-based, non-incumbent provider..."
>
> There's also a reference further down (p24) to "voice service of standard
> quality".  That rules out Skype or any non-QoS-enabled VoIP platform, or any
> non-PSTN non-E.164 service.  If this were the only issue though, it would be
> easy enough to provide a technical fix.
>
> The rule appears aimed at cable.  If there is unsubsidized PacketCable
> telephony, then why should the FCC subsidize ILECs?
>
> There's also support in the bill for "mobile wireless" providers.  Over the
> past decade, CMRS carriers have been the largest (by far) competitive ETCs.
> Current FCC plans phase this out.  The largest recipients are AT&T and
> Verizon, the latter via its Alltel / Western Wireless purchase.  The Boucher
> (D-Verizon) bill instead allows CMRSs to bid to become the supported mobile
> carrier in a given area.
>
> There are various other goodies (if you're Verizon) in the bill, including
> an order that the FCC complete intercarrier compensation reform within a
> year (it has been an open docket since April, 2001, and each Commission
> seems to want to pass the ball to its successor rather than do anything).
> And section 303 apparently bans access revenue sharing, so the free
> conference call industry goes out of business.  I guess we'll all have to
> move our conference calls to the Internet.  This is a real pain, but VZ, ATT
> and Sprint don't want to pay the teensy bit that it costs them (though it
> helps encourage the sale of overpriced flat-rate usage plans).
>
> The bill adds USF taxes to WISPs and basically prohibits them from
> receiving anything.  This is consistent with the FCC's current "pay for the
> bullet" proposal.  Such a deal!
>
>  --
>  Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
>  ionary Consulting                http://www.ionary.com/
>  +1 617 795 2701
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to