I'm new to MT MPLS, but I think MPLS TE could arrange that. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/27/2010 5:54 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote: > At 8/27/2010 05:19 PM, you wrote: >> Why? 4.9 Ghz licenses are basically automatic. If the agency already has >> ANY FCC license, then a 4.9 is simply an add on that >> has very little engineering information. >> >> By any - I mean they license they do their dispatch on. > Are WISPs here providing backhaul for their local 4.9 GHz licensee > using the same ISP backbone that carries commercial traffic, isolated > backhaul frequencies on the 4.9 band, or a VPN on the ISP backhaul > frequencies? > > It seems to me that a "Carrier Ethernet" class backhaul network, with > some CIR per layer 2 virtual circuit, would provide the PS users with > some assurance of capacity. But I don't know if it can be > provisioned in any of the low-cost router OSs. Sure would be nice. > > -- > Fred Goldstein k1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com > ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/ > +1 617 795 2701 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
