On the bigger equipment, the switches are much more affordable than
the routers, but the routers scale up much higher.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/8/2010 4:36 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 16:31, Matt Jenkins <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am trying to find a Layer 3 switch that has 24 or 48 1000 base-T
ports
with enough RAM to handle Full BGP Internet Routes. Anyone have any
suggestions?
For those who wonder why.... I am upgrading all of my backhauls to
support ~300mbps. In addition I need to be able to offer BGP
connections
to customers from this ring of backhauls.
Seems like an interesting combination of things there. If I may ask,
why don't you leave the ring stuff and switching to the switches, and
routing stuff like BGP to separate routers? It'll probably make things
a lot easier to set up, and you'll be free to get the best switches
and the best routers for your needs instead of trying to find
something that's only so-so at either task.
(Not intended as criticism, I'm actually kinda curious about this
network layout.)
David Smith
MVN.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
