CW,

It appears as though they may be backing off trying to control billing
methods.  However, they are pushing heavily to void the ability for WISPs to
manage their network traffic.  That will mean no QOS, no bursting, no
blocking of websites or controlled traffic flows.  We all know what the
impact of this decision will have on our businesses.  

The FCC seems to be trying to force this rulemaking through before the new
congress is seated.  You can read some interesting commentary on
http://www.stimulatingbroadband.com/.  Very little information about the
proposal has been leaked to the media.  The FCC plans on voting on it at the
hearing on December 21st.  

What we do know is that fixed wireless broadband will fall in a category of
strict open internet regulation along with fiber, DSL and cable
technologies.  Meanwhile, mobile broadband providers will receive relaxed
treatment due to the challenges that large traffic flows such as Netflix and
other streaming video websites demand out of infrastructure that cannot
handle the massive quantity of traffic this presents.   

I ask you and all WISPs, "What will happen to your networks and quality of
service if you cannot manage your network traffic any longer?" and "Are you
prepared to pay fines if you ignore federal policy and legislation, deal
with suits from customers who feel you are managing their traffic or be
unable to prioritize different protocols to maximize the performance of your
network?"  I know the answers will be the same for every wireless provider
in the nation.  That means that EVERY wireless provider in the nation needs
to make a stand Monday or Tuesday and file your comments.  It may be the
most productive use of an hour this year.

If the FCC does manage to get this rulemaking accomplished, then the next
battle will start and it will be essential that congressmen and legislators
are written, met with and educated.  This is BAD policy for rural America,
it will cost jobs, small businesses and widen the digital divide for years
to come.

Other articles to read:
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2010/12/01/5557460-fcc-net-neutrality-plan-fac
es-battle-with-gop
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704720804576009713669482024.ht
ml?mod=wsj_share_twitter
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/121245-republicans-who-v
ote-to-regulate-the-internet-may-get-cover-from-telecom-groups-but-not-the-t
ea-party

Its time to do your homework and Monday and Tuesday will be your test.

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
[email protected]


 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of cw
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 9:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [WISPA Members] WISPA Files Ex Parte on Network Neutrality
> 
> Excuse my ignorance. I've not much time for the world of late. The FCC
> is proposing rules that would regulate how a provider bills? - cw
> 
> On 12/10/2010 6:35 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:
> > fixed wireless will be included in the more heavily
> > regulated class of broadband providers. On the other hand, the
> Chairman
> > has indicated that he will allow "pay-as-you-go" or usage-based
> billing.
> > Not sure about any caps or constraints, but at least on this point
> the
> > Chairman is open to innovative billing models.
> _______________________________________________
> 
> WISPA Membership Mailing List
> 
> -----------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to